Association of Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Depression with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in Korean Adults: Results from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2014

Background@#Subclinical thyroid disease is characterized by abnormal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels with normal free thyroxine (T4) levels. This study aimed to verify the association between subclinical hypothyroidism and depression measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score in the Korean population. @*Methods@#This cross-sectional study included 1,786 adults aged ≥19 years with normal free T4 levels and serum TSH levels ≥0.45 mIU/L who had participated in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2014. The PHQ-9 was first introduced in the KNHANES to detect depression (PHQ score of ≥10). Serum TSH level of 0.45–4.49 mIU/L was defined as the reference range. The association between subclinical hypothyroidism and depression according to gender and age was evaluated using the binary logistic regression analysis after adjusting for age, education, and body mass index. @*Results@#There was no association between subclinical hypothyroidism and depression according to gender. The odds ratio for depression was 2.498 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.905–6.895; P=0.077) in men and 0.727 (95% CI, 0.352–1.503; P=0.390) in women. Additionally, there was no association between subclinical hypothyroidism and depression according to age. @*Conclusion@#These results suggest that subclinical hypothyroidism was not associated with depression in Korean adults.

Introduction of Fall Risk Assessment (FRA) System and Cross-Sectional Validation Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults

OBJECTIVE: To predict the risk of falls, Fall Risk Assessment (FRA) system has been newly developed to measure multi-systemic balance control among community-dwelling older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the association between FRA and fall-related physical performance tests. METHODS: A total of 289 community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older participated in this cross-sectional study. All participants underwent FRA test and physical performance tests such as Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). RESULTS: Participants who were younger, male, highly educated, living with family members, having high body mass index, having high appendicular lean mass index, and having no irritative lower urinary tract syndrome were more likely to have higher FRA scores. SPPB (β=1.012), BBS (β=0.481), and TUG (β=-0.831) were significantly associated with FRA score after adjusting for the variables (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: FRA composite score was closely correlated with SPPB, BBS, and TUG, suggesting that FRA is a promising candidate as a screening tool to predict falls among community-dwelling elderly people.

Modified Criteria for Diagnosing “Cognitive Frailty”

The concept of cognitive frailty has recently been proposed by an International Consensus Group as the presence of physical frailty and cognitive impairment [defined using the Clinical Dementia Ratings (CDR)=0.5], without concurrent dementia. However, CDR is difficult to implement and not often available in epidemiologic studies or busy clinical settings, and an alternative to CDR is required. We suggest an alternative definition of cognitive frailty as: 1) physical frailty, 2) more than 1.5 standard deviation below the mean for age-, gender-, and education-adjusted norms on any cognitive function test (e.g., the Montreal Cognitive assessment test, the Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale, verbal learning test, Digit Span, Boston Naming Test, Trail Making Test, and Frontal Assessment Battery), and 3) no dependency in instrumental activities of daily living. The redefined criteria for cognitive frailty would be more feasible to implement and thus more applicable in epidemiologic studies and busy clinical settings.

Is Helicobacter pylori Associated Functional Dyspepsia Correlated With Dysbiosis?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess the long-term effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on symptomatic improvement according to the type of antibiotic and the duration of treatment in H. pylori-associated functional dyspepsia. METHODS: We searched Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library databases for randomized controlled trials written in English and undertaken up to August 2016 that met our eligibility criteria. The search methodology used combinations of the following keywords: Helicobacter pylori OR H. pylori OR HP; dyspepsia OR functional dyspepsia OR non-ulcer dyspepsia; eradication OR cure OR treatment. The study outcome was the summary odds ratio (OR) for symptomatic improvement in H. pylori-associated functional dyspepsia with successful eradication therapy. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the type of antibiotic, and the duration of treatment, whether or not patients had symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, and on race. RESULTS: Sixteen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. The summary OR for symptomatic improvement in patients in our eradication group was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16–1.54; P < 0.01). In a subgroup analysis on type of antibiotic, symptomatic improvement with metronidazole-containing regimen (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.26–2.77) was better than treatment with clarithromycin (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.11–1.50). H. pylori eradication therapy given for 10–14 days was the more effective for symptom improvement than 7-day therapy. When the studies excluding irritable bowel syndrome cases were analyzed, there were no therapeutic effects of H. pylori eradication on symptomatic improvement. CONCLUSIONS: In the clinical setting, the most effective H. pylori eradication regimen for functional dyspepsia to provide relief of symptoms is a metronidazole-based treatment regimen for at least 10 days. The explanation for this is that H. pylori-associated functional dyspepsia could be associated with dysbiosis.